patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Council Approves Rosewood Beach Redesign

The City Council voted on Monday to approve the Rosewood Beach redesign proposal. Construction is expected to begin next summer.

 

The Highland Park City Council voted unanimously on Monday to approve of the Rosewood Beach redesign proposal. Construction is expected to begin next summer.

"I will take a great deal of pride that I'm part of a governing body that will restore the beach," said newly appointed City Councilman Sally Higginson before casting her vote in favor of the redesign.

Want Highland Park news in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Patch's newsletter.

The plan that the park district board passed in August was recently approved by both the Design Review and Natural Resource Commission. Monday was the first time the project had been discussed at length by the City Council.

The Park District of Highland Park Board of Commissioners voted to approve the Rosewood Beach redesign proposal after over a year of intense planning, beach tours and sometimes heated public debate. In addition to the controversial interpretive center that has frequently been the sole component of the plan to provoke opposition from residents, the plan also includes a guard house, restrooms, concessions and a boardwalk. 

The total estimated cost for the project is $4,661,372.

The City Council began discussing the proposal at the end of a packed meeting that included the appointment of Patch columnist Sally Higginson to the City Council, a tax hike and the approval of a water plant upgrade.

"We're one of just 13 communities along Lake Michigan," said Park Board President Scott Meyers while discussing the project before the City Council. "It is our responsibility to teach our children about this natural resource."

Members of the community spoke both against and in favor of the plan, though Mayor Nancy Rotering was quick to point out to speakers on both sides that the City Council was only judging the project based on whether or not it broke any city ordinances.

"Our purview is a narrow area," Rotering said. "Have the standards in our city ordinances been met?"

The message seemed to go mostly disregarded. Many speakers presented arguments against the interpretive center similar to those that they had presented at park district meetings earlier this year. 

"My two twins are 10 months old, I don't have plans to take them to the beach and put them in a building," said David Greenberg, who spoke against the plan. "I have plans to take them to the beach and put them in the sand to play as I did when I was a child."

Amy Lohmolder brought up the petition that over 1,000 residents signed against the interpretive center, and said that the city's governing bodies had disregarded these objections.

"The public is being ignored again and again," she said.

Ravinia Neighbors Association President Don Miller asked the City Council to accept the project proposal, but scrap the interpretive center.

"I've seen what happens to buildings built close to the waterfront," he said.

Others spoke in favor of the plan, including members of the community group Friends of Rosewood.

"Without Lake Michigan, there would be no Chicago, no Highland Park or Waukegan," said Friends of Rosewood member David Schneiderman, arguing in favor of the redesign.

After about a half hour of residents speaking about the project, City Council members began discussing their thoughts on the beach, the design and the process itself.

"The park district has listened considerably to the input of the community," Councilman Paul Frank said. People from the Ravinia Neighbors Association, I think it's important you recognize your impact on this project."

Councilman David Naftzger said that these decisions are difficult, and applauded the residents involved for a "healthy debate."

"We do simply need to move on," he said.

Meyers said called the vote gratifying, and applauded the City Council for thoroughly reviewing the project materials.

"It's been a long and arduous process," he said. "I'm glad that we are now in a position where we can move forward and actually give our community the beach they deserve."

For more news and updates, "like" us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: Rosewood Beach and Rosewood Beach redesign

Moe @ the Buck

1:19 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Breaking news!....... Theres no news to report! What??? How about some interesting news Patch? Let's try to encourage young kids in the community to give back?? Or maybe put the spotlight on someone who made a small difference our area? I know, I know,Moe, your a dreamer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve S.

8:30 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

I'm with you Moe, gyros and wings..... gyros and wings.......

HP360

8:31 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Although I think everyone realized the vote was a foregone conclusion, I give kudos to the council for allowing the group that attended the meeting to again speak and express the passion that remains with this project. Many eyes will be upon this project to make sure that promises made are kept and that construction is quick, efficient and environmentally friendly as possible. Watching the city council meeting (on this topic) was like watching the season finale of a long on-going tv drama. No cliff hanger but hopes that the next season will reveal some exciting news.

Reply

forest barbieri

10:14 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Thanks to all who made this happen! Finally 60035 will have a Beach that we can all enjoy and worthy of the N Shore taxes we pay! Now let's move on to the schools which face many important issues with even more lasting effect on our community, children and property values supporting those high taxes. Capital needs, continual educational improvement in the face of disproportionate class sizes and the looming hand off of pension responsibilities from the state coffers to the district level and ultimately our pockets, in the form of increased taxes to compensate for the pension debacle. Perhaps, it is time for a serious reform of state pensions that allow for double dipping and spiking the pension in later years.

Reply

Moe @ the Buck

3:03 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Steve S, your first week of lunch is on me. Thanks for your support! Forest, where the hell Have you been? Nice to have you back. I hope everyone is having a great day!

Reply

Moe @ the Buck

8:08 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Sorry Stevie Janowski, I failed on your story about your spot in Lake Forest,Donati's. I almost went there the other day, but went to Left Bank instead. I had two sloppy joes with cheese and got $50 for cleaning Lanes (the owners) gutters at his house. Maybe this "Donati's" guy needs his gutters cleaned? Then I can go there, eat pizza, and get $50 from him???

Reply

Leave a comment