patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

District 112 Teachers Explain Intent to Strike

The union that represents Highland Park's elementary and middle school teachers says the school board is 'pinching on pennies.' A strike could begin in mid-October.

 

The following is a letter to the editor from the North Shore Education Association (NSEA) explaining the decision to file a Notice of Intent To Strike.

The NSEA delivered the 10-Day Notice of Intent to Strike on Friday to the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board (IELRB) and the North Shore School District 112 School Board and Regional Superintendent.

The NSEA was extremely disappointed when the Board's final offer showed absolutely no discernible movement by the school board from their previous offer to the NSEA. While the NSEA made a huge change in its position in the final offer, hoping to show its sincere desire to reach an amicable settlement, the teachers were extremely dismayed to see no change on the part of the board. It seems that while the board does not mind paying huge administrative salaries (including pension benefits, bonuses, disability insurance, cash instead of family insurance, all costing tens of thousands of dollars), when it comes to the teachers, the board is insisting on pinching pennies.

If the NSEA accepted the board's ridiculously meager offer, the District 112 teachers would not ratify the contract. They feel they deserve better. They feel that they deserve compensation and benefits at least on par with those of surrounding districts. They feel that it's not fair for a teacher earning a Master's degree in education to not get repaid for that tuition for 28 years (in many other districts, the district pays for part of the tuition AND allows teachers to move lanes, thus recouping the cost in 3 to 5 years).

In short, the NSEA is determined to keep our school district where it belongs -- attracting and keeping the best teachers and giving our students a world-class education.

To see the Board's response to the intent to strike, click here. To read Ed Brill's editorial on the District 112 contract negotiations, click here.

For more news and updates, "like" us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: District 112, North Shore Education Association, and Teachers' Strike

Me

6:06 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Highland Park taxpayers better reach for their wallets. The teachers are about to rake you over the coals.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

2:42 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

No tax increase has been asked for. Did you read the proposals?

Comment_arrow

m

5:57 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Really? Do you know that the Board's offer at this time is the WORST CONTRACT ON the ENTIRE NORTH SHORE??? It is worse than Deerfield, Lake Forest, Glencoe, and Northbrook!! Shame on you!
Now...maybe we can take a look at the ADMINISTRATOR salaries and benefits. Hmmmmm...Lots to look at there.

Standards

6:28 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

I think a full reassessment of the School Board Salary and Benefits is in order and a realignment of benefits going forward so they are equal for the teachers. If what is reported is true, then a reduction across the board is in order and everything should be on par for both board and teachers. Fair is Fair. They can work within the budget and not raise taxes, which by the way, we just had a huge increase.

Also given the past debacle of the Park District Board pension and payments, this wreaks of something is just not right and a magnifying glass needs to be used to review what is going on with School Board Compensation ASAP.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vel

9:09 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

The Board of Education is not paid, they are a volunteer body. Perhaps you are referring to the administration.

Comment_arrow

Standards

10:27 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Yes, sorry I stand corrected..

llwvrt

6:53 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Future teacher salaries would be tied to CPI. Read the proposal from the teachers please rather than assume it is tied to your tax bill. I do not think that the school board is a paid position. It is an elected one.

Reply

Lou

7:07 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

I enjoy paying taxes that directly benefit my kids, our neighbors' kids, the future leaders of our county. It's not smart to skimp on education. I pay about $ 55.00 a week for school district 112, it costs me about that to fill up my car with gas. It's all good. Tax me more, make me happier.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MS

7:10 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Lou, why not just write a check to District 112 yourself?

Chilawyer

7:16 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Well, then, Lou, you should be thrilled to live in Illinois, the happy state for taxpayers who love taking it in the butt.

There is a District 112 Foundation, you can be sure Lou knows about them but has never written them a check.

Reply

Sue Richman

7:24 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Talk about being blind- the teachers in HP have had a great run over the last 30 years being some of the most highly compensated teachers in the State- Sure they do a great job -but only fools would be unable to recognize that things have changed- residents in HP are facing draconian losses in their home values and although it is a wealthy district- no one these days is receiving the raises they were getting before the financial crisis occurred- If the teachers can't accept the reality that the District CANNOT continue to provide more money at the expense of the taxpayers then let them all go on strike until they come to their senses or, if necessary, replace them- Someone within the Union is certainly misreading community sentiment

Reply
Comment_arrow

RAM

7:23 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Sue great post except we are paying the Administration way more money. Highland Park District 112 currently employs a very expensive administration. Moshen Dada was making 341,000 a year at his last school. I am assuming he is making the same here. He is getting a 250,000 a year pension. The teachers are paying for the School boards horrible decisions. If we are cutting back cut the administration first.

Comment_arrow

llwvrt

9:37 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

If you read the proposals as opposed to just listening to rhetoric, you would see that the teachers are not asking the taxpayers for money. The new monies are from CPI and new construction, not tax dollars. They are NOT asking for huge raises. Please do not fall prey to rumor mongering. Thank you. http://district112teachers.org/

The Q

7:31 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Great schools are not cheap

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue Richman

7:40 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

You need to be better informed- money is a factor but not the most significant factor in terms of school quality- the kids in NS 112 mostly come from homes where education is a priority and and parents who encourage their children to perform- I would think the outcome would be substantially the same regardless whether the teachers were paid at the top of the state salary scale-A quality education is worth the community's financial contribution but not if it results in a situation where the bank runs dry-The Board is dong the right thing in terms of keeping its eye on the future fiscal health of the District

wendy posnock

7:36 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Everyone who is commenting really needs to read in depth the two proposals. The teachers truly have made some extreme concessions while the Board has barely moved. Their position is insulting to the teachers and I feel does not fairly represent the position of the vast majority of the homeowners in HP. We all live in this community at least in part to provide an excellent eduction to our kids. The teachers would end up with a substantial reduction in net take home pay while the Administrators have not been asked to make the same cuts. Thank goodness HP is not in the dire financial straights that the Board presents. Reserve and operating funds are up and we need to present a fair contract that we can affords and at the same time does not hurt our teachers!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue Richman

7:49 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Have you commissioned a poll on community sentiment- how do you know how the "vast majority of the homeowners " feel- My kids went through the system and I have always been happy to pay for the teachers and continue to be prepared to do so but the Board is doing exactly what the financial situation demands and that is applying the brakes to what has been costs in excess of inflation for what has been a very long time

Comment_arrow

Standards

10:29 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

I agree, and I think review of the entire compensation system to the paid members of the Adminstration should be done. Who knows what we will find, we were blind when the Park District ripped us off.

Paul Doppelt

8:01 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

There was a panel comprised of teachers, district residents and other education professionals. I hear that the bloated administration was a major problem.

Reply

wendy posnock

8:03 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

The prior teachers contract has some high increases in the overall picture of the contract but that was not the norm. The statistics that the Board presented that the teachers all received 11-15% increases on average are just plain incorrect. That was in a very few cases not the norm (as it should not be.) The community "poll" as you asked about is in my discussions with the parents at my daughters school. I am a finance and real estate person - so I get putting the brakes on as you said and being conservative - but bottom line - the teachers need to be paid fairly and the cuts they are being asked to make need to be reasonable and in line with what the Administrators are being asked to make.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue Richman

8:16 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

What you need to remember is that the "community" is comprised of homeowners with kids in the schools but the majority of homeowners have no children in the schools- the vast majority to whom you refer is not reality- perhaps the Board knows what the majority of its constituents want to see happen- After years of excessive contracts some reasonable givebacks might be in order- Do you really think a 15K retirement bonus intended to provide a higher pension benefit is reasonable when TRS is 60 percent underfunded? When did the concept of retirement bonuses enter into the realm of public employment?

Comment_arrow

David R.

12:34 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Wendy--I found that the opposite is true. Most of the parents with whom I've spoken concur that the Board's proposal is very fair and the that union has to get more in touch with the realities of the economy. Unfortunately, many of these same parents (myself included) are afraid to speak publicly in favor of their position because they do want want their children to suffer any consequences in the classroom.

Comment_arrow

Standards

12:43 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

David R you must have a closed circle of parents you talk to. I know plenty of parents who feel otherwise, so don't make such broad statements on behalf of a community. And I highly doubt any teacher would make a kid suffer for their parents opinions. That is a total insult to teachers and the people whom we entrust our childrens education.

HPParent

9:53 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Here is the main issue for everyone who just assumes it's all about salary. It's really all about the Board living up to the commitment it has made to teachers. Don't vilify teachers who are only asking for what was promised to them by the Board.

The truth: Teachers spending tens of thousands of dollars to improve their own education so they can improve their ability to educate HP kids have had the rug pulled out from under their feet by the Board. Under the current proposal, teachers would not be granted the salary increases they would earn when they earn Masters' degrees. THis was a promise made to teachers by the board, now the board wants to take that away, saddling teachers who have paid tens of thousands of dollars and taken out loans to improve their ability to teach our kids.

Seems trust is an issue here. If your employer told you that you would earn more if you went out and got a Masters degree or a PhD, then reneged on that promise after doing exactly that, I doubt you would be happy about that. So, lets get the Board to live up to its promise and maybe we can get through this.

Reply

Lily

9:57 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

We need an AUDIT of the district administration with all salaries, benefits, bonuses. I completely agree with the comment from "Standards" except I think they meant the district administration. This also reminds me of the park district fiasco where the commissioners became too cozy with the park district administrators and awarded them outrageously generous compensation packages. Our school board may have the best of intentions, but they spend a lot of time working with the district administration and do not have the balls to say no to them. I read in a comment this week that over the summer they approved a $37,000 bonus for Behlow. Really? Take a look at this story from April: http://highlandpark.patch.com/articles/district-112-will-cut-2-65-million
Upon the administration's advice, the Board cut 69 staff members, including teachers and teacher's assistants, in order to trim $2.65 million from its 2013 budget. The board also voted to cut an additional student services coordinator. Board member Marcia Bogolub suggested the cut "in the spirit of shared sacrifice." Why are sacrifices by the administrators in spirit only? We have too many administrators and they are paid too much! If we keep all of them and fire our teachers, who will teach our children?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Standards

10:30 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Thank you for that information, it is eye opening and disgusting at same time. We as a community must do right for the teachers and our kids.

Comment_arrow

David R.

11:00 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Lily, let's hope you're not teaching math to my kids. Even if you trimmed administration by 50% (unrealistic given the federal and state paperwork requirements), that wouldn't make a dent in the long-term budgetary issues we face. Yes, adminstrative costs should be closely monitored, but it's a red herring.

Comment_arrow

NS

11:16 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Because, Lily, the northshore mentaility, the mentality of the priviledged, is to place false and misguided value in those that are in power. Those that are in power tend to demand, and are even rewarded, the most money due to those who blindfully give these people the belief that they are powerful. A bit preachy? Probably. But we must start asking ourselves who is truly benefiting? And I don't mean monetarily.

Comment_arrow

Lily

11:33 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

David R., I'm a parent, not a teacher in our district. Regardless, no need to be insulting. Cutting administrative costs is not a red herring. We don't know what all of the numbers are so we can't say whether that is sufficient. At the very least, it's a start.

Let's see a complete accounting of all of the administrators including their benefits packages. We have a superintendent, assistant superintendents, finance chief, technology head and staff, curriculum heads, at least 14 principals and possibly more, each with administrative staffs. Our district is operating too many buildings too.
Working under administrators who are paid too highly via salaries, bonuses, better health insurance, pensions and other benefits, must be demoralizing to our teachers. It has to be demoralizing to our teachers to always be the ones to make concessions and/or lose jobs while watching the fat cats who fire you and your peers get even fatter.

Ed Brill

10:11 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

@Wendy Posnock the Teachers Union tells me they believe the average raise was 13.8% during the last three-year contract.

Reply

Elaine Van Dusen

10:15 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Are these teachers free to take their nssd 112-compensated advanced degrees and take them to a new school district without penalty?

Bottom line, there should be no sacred cows, and all potential savings should be looked at including administration and their compensation, consolidation of schools, and getting the money due the school district from the outlay for those who parents are serving in the military. While there is no expectation that we will ever see any money from the state, perhaps the state mandated circulum which include gym every day should be reviewed. Since "gym" amounts to not much more than an extra recess each day, perhaps the kids would be better off actually learning something in a classroom instead of playing with swimming pool noodles during "gym".

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

2:47 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Teachers aren't paid for their degrees- they make a lane movement which in no way immediately compensates them for monies spent. It takes a number of years to earn back the cost of a degree. Years in which the classroom, students, and teacher peers benefit. There is also no promise that another district will do the same for a new hire. However, another district might provide some other benefit which our district doesn't offer or is planning on cutting.

Steve Buti

11:32 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Ernest, to begin with it is called Physical Education not "gym". I am not sure what school you are looking at that does "not much more then play with swimming pool noodles" (we do use those for some activities...they are great for tag games). I know my fellow Physical Educators do a fantastic job offering a variety of activities that are meaningful and challenging for their students. I teach Physical Education at Lincoln School and we have an extensive curriculum (including the following units: soccer, football, golf, Frisbee, Tchoukball, Volleyball, Hockey, Climbing, Basketball, Team Building, Tumbling/Gymnastics, Track & Field, Softball/Baseball, Bowling, and more. We also have the students participate in many other activities outside of those units like Fitness Testing and our Winter Olympics. Also, the District 112 Physical Education Teachers are working on updating the curriculum that will be even more complete covering both Physical Education and Health Education for the entire district. So to correct you sir, it IS MUCH MORE then an extra recess each day.

Steve Buti - Proud Physical Education Teacher at Lincoln School

Reply
Comment_arrow

Standards

11:44 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

GOOD FOR YOU!! I as a parent appreciate all your contributions to our children and stand with you in this battle. I hope there is no strike, and if there is, we as a community need let the Administration know what we think, including auditing their benefits packages, etc. I'm sure there is alot of bloat there that could be used to even the playing field with the teachers.

Me

12:43 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Highland Park needs to look a couple of miles north during this negotiation. Please learn from the mistakes made in Lake Forest. The teachers will claim that if Highland Park refuses to meet their demands, then Highland Park will become a "feeder" system for the other schools that pay more. There will be threats that your schools will become second rate because you are no longer the HIGHEST paying district. You will only be AMONG the highest paying. They will say that "this is for the children" and "they are passionate about teaching". They will not hesitate to walk out on your children and to hold their education hostage and they will do so at the most disruptive time possible so that they will force you to cave in to their demands. You need to hope that your School Board has the backbone to stand firm. Otherwise, this is all a waste of time. In fact, it is counter-productive as you are only reinforcing the concept that they can use a strike to get whatever they want. We need to cease this unsustainable arms race of what district can pay the highest salaries.

Notwithstanding, we do have great teachers and, for the most part, they are well liked both by students and by parents. There should be a system where they are paid well and that they get increases based on performance and CPI. What is not realistic is a system where they see some extra money in a budget or they see the ability to increase taxes and they stake a claim to it just because it is there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

9:40 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

No one is asking for tax increases; please do not be misguided by the words of those who have not read the proposals. Thank you.
http://district112teachers.org/

Pamela Kramer

12:46 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Also, physical education is mandated by the state. Years ago, when the students didn't have daily PE, a parent complained to the state. Now we have PE. It's really not a choice. And, as Steve Buti points out, it's where students learn cooperation and teamwork -- and get exercise, too!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alexa Martinez

2:54 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Before thinking about PE, your school needs to improve. Failing minority poor children is a shame for our rich district. The union in your school it is making things hard to reform. It is misinforming parents about the truth needs of the school and what teachers are fighting for (more things for the classroom). Why not present a real Performance Plan that would bring REAL results in your school, because OAK TERRACE IF FAILING.

The Q

12:50 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

its not like these teachers are getting rich folks......its not cheap to live on the north shore. if you want to attract the best teachers, money talks and you know what walks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MS

12:56 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Maybe instead of telling private property owners that they are not allowed to sell their own hourses we could encourage such sales and increased construction to bring in revenue so we can afford to pay teachers better.

Comment_arrow

David R.

1:37 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

The Q--Even the union would concede that there's not anywhere for these teachers to "walk to" right now. And the raises for these phantom positions would be negligible if anything. That's hardly an incentive for a 112 teacher to move distircts. The bottom line is that teacher supply far outpaces teacher demand. Every opening in our district receives dozens of highly qualified applicants. That will continue to be true if the teachers receive only the reasonable raises that the Board has offered.

Comment_arrow

Standards

3:03 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

What you don't get David R is that they do have a place to walk to, and its called a picket line. THey can stay on that picket line for so long, our kids educations will suffer for it. And, they have that right to, and I'd picket with them whilst I get up a petition to have the entire District Compensation reviewed.

Comment_arrow

Mark Stein

3:38 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

The NSEA wouldn't concede that there aren't openings for new teachers in the area. Every year there are retirements in every area district. Furthermore, there are always nontenured teachers that are let go.

Even District 112 was filling around 30 positions with new teachers this year. When Districts look to fill these openings, a District 112 teacher with a year or two of experinece will be more attractive than somone right out of school.

wendy posnock

12:54 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

David. What I have found from parents who are not supporting the teachers is that they truly have not read both sides of the proposals very carefully. Like I said - I understand extremely well the financial aspect of this; and as a homeowner want to keep taxes low and at the same time education exceptional . the boards proposal is no where near fair - it literally is asking the teachers to take a very large take-home pay cut; and based on the phenomenal job they do for our kids - I am firmly against it.

Reply

wendy posnock

12:58 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Look at the recent contract agreed to in Skokie at district 219. These teachers were Days away from a walkout and they were able to find common ground at a reasonable cost for everyone involved. The teachers basically agreed (as they are doing in hp) to a large increase in healthcare costs out of pocket and a small 1.02% raise. Te net contract is basically a net zero to both teachers and taxpayers...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue Richman

3:51 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Wendy- that is a far cry from what the Teachers are seeking in HP- They have convinced themselves of their false value- Perhaps they need to recognize that the taxpayers who foot the bill are sitting on real estate losses of 30 to 40 percent since 2006 and that many have either suffered career issues or have children who have been forced to accept lesser jobs or have no jobs at all- the economy is awful but hey- the teachers are entitled to a 16 percent raise so lets give it to them

Sue Richman

4:00 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

My greatest hope is that the Board has someone who monitors these messages so they can gleen where the community sentiment is- The Board is doing the absolutely right thing trying to pare back the overly generous contract deals their predecessors negotiated- If the teachers are dissatisfied with what is on the table let them risk their futures and call a strike and hopefully the community will stand with the Board- Public sentiment has moved away from blindly supporting public employees who have no concept of what is occuring in the private sector which pays for all of their salaries and benefits

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

9:43 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Ms. Richman, I do hope that you will take the time to read the proposals rather than jump to conclusions. Many teachers live in Highland Park and are active members of the community. Perhaps you could check out the link for the teacher proposal? No one is asking for blind support except perhaps the BOE. http://district112teachers.org/

Sue Richman

4:16 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

As an interesting aside for those who have followed what is going on within the District- The current Board is being forced to deal with prolfigate spending mistakes which occurred over the past decade- while the school population actually slightly decreased between 2000 and 2010- the District's salaried full-time/part-time work force increased by more then 10 percent and costs exploded- perhaps not everything can be solved with one contract but anyone who argues that the teachers are simply trying to hold on to what they already have needs to recognize that what they already have exceeds the District's ability to maintain

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

5:50 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

The BOE was able to put away two million dollars last year Ms. Richman, while paying for salaries and other obligations. No one is asking for the BOE to exceed it's ability to maintain.

AGF

6:26 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

School supplies for the new school year $200.00
Promethean boards (one classroom) $2,000.00
New classroom computers (24) $20,000.00
Principal's Salary (1) $140,000.00
Superintendent (with bonus) $ 250,000.00
D112 Teachers PRICELESS

We need to realize the real importance of our teachers, BOE take care of our teachers!

Reply

Lou

7:36 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Chilawyer: not only have I written OUR foundation a check I have supported them in other ways since its inception. I pay about $ 55.00 per week to District 112 to educate and care for our most precious assets, my kids and yours. A carton of cigarettes cost more than that. Most lawyers I know spend way more than $55.00 per week entertaining their wealthy clients. I would not mind at all if District 112 charged me twice that, it is money well spent. As the top lawyers get paid the most money, likewise, the best teachers deserve high salaries and good benefits. Let's maintain HP's reputation for excellent schools and not dare demoralize our fantastic teachers nor allow our property values to diminish. Raise my taxes, it's a good investment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chilawyer

12:09 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Lou:

If you are so eager to be charged twice, what's holding you up. Put your money where your keyboard is, and write a check now.

Now, every District 112 teacher cannot be "the best teachers" or there couldn't be a superlative. If you are suggesting they are the best over their bretren elsewhere just by virtue of being esconced in North Shore school, well, that smacks of elitism. Indeed, elitism is what you are really about, isn't it Lou. You get some perverse rich guy's enjoyment at saying you pay more taxes than poor plebes elsewhere.

Our teachers are not so "fantastic" when they are willing to demoralize their students, and the entire community, by going on strike en masse. Lawyers, be they "top" (whatever that means in your mind) or not quite as elite, do not go on strike against their clients. If there is an irreconcilable problem, they withdraw, giving their clients time to engage other counsel. We don't have that option with the teachers, do we, Lou, because they are so "fantastic" and each and every one of them is a great educator and irreplaceable.

Finally, your "pennies a day" rhetorical device about "only" $55 per week for District 112 ignores all the other taxes we have to pay to myriad government entities, starting with the balance sheet bankrupt United States. Did you notice that your state income taxes rose 60% last year, Lou, or is that another one of your terrific investments.

Keep on bending over, Lou, it's a great investment.

Ashley Howard

10:33 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Sue Richmond..your posts are extremely well said and factual. Thank you.
Lou...you keep that money flowing to 112... We are counting on you.
For each available position in 112 how many good applicants do you think there are? Probably hundreds...
Finally, perhaps the Union will lower their fees that each teacher must pay to them monthly....haven't heard that one offered.
finally...we the people are tapped out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

5:53 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

I am sorry Ms. Howard, but the proposals are connected to new monies, and new monies only. There is no tax increase proposed.
http://district112teachers.org/

Alexa Martinez

11:38 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

We should be asking in the contract for evaluations. Accordingl to the Illinois Interactive Report Card, Edgewood Middle school and Northwood did not make AYP (adequate yearly progress) and the worst school in the district is Oak Terrace which has failed to make AYP for more than 4 consecutive years, 4 students out of 10 @ Oak Terrace do not know how to read nor write. This school is failing the minority Hispanic students that attend and most of the kids from the base, which is a disgrace. But nobody is talking about how this school is failing because these are minority poor children. The school needs to be turned over. Fire the principal, teachers and bring a program that can he'll these kids. No more money for those teachers until they achieve better results. It is a shame.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

5:44 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Alexa, these comments were already refuted by Ms. Kramer in a different post. Your making them is simply inflammatory and an attempt to redirect the conversation. And unfair to the staff, students, and families of Oak Terrace School. FYI - the high school did not make AYP.

Comment_arrow

Alexa Martinez

1:11 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

llwvrt, I get it you are here representing the teachers. FYI this is a free forum, and if I want to talk about the problems that our children are facing in this district, I have the right to do it. The Union is misinforming the parents and community. Not all the schools from this district deliver world class education, what about those Hispanic poor children that attend Oak Terrace? For you it is ok that 4 out of 10 students do not know how to read, because your children attend a school with higher results. This is what is happening in our very own community, one of the richest that happens to share the district with Highwood where the poor kids are coming from. We need to stand for these children, because teachers can be asking form more benefits and higher salaries, but are they really delivering a world class education as they claim? When is the principal going to release the improvement plan. The Board needs to take action and stop paying high salaries to non performing teachers and principals.

Comment_arrow

llwvrt

5:54 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Alexa, do you think you could possibly stop referring to the Oak Terrace population as "Hispanic poor children?" You are entitled to think what you wish but you are being insulting in your misguided attempt to call attention to your personal vendetta.

Comment_arrow

Alexa Martinez

6:08 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

llwvrt, why am I being insulting when I am speaking the truth? Oak Terrace 90% students are Hispanic and poor, the rest are white and some Asian. Another fact is that the school is failing, that is not an insult, it is the truth. The insults come from the Union and the teachers claiming that they are providing "world class education" when reality is that this school is failing. It is not about personal vendettas, it is about a community that overlooks facts because it does not affect them personally. Parents at these schools are being let down and misguided. Just call the school and ask for your Hispanic kid to be placed in an English program and Mr. Girarldo (in charge of the program) will scare the heck out of any parent telling them that the school will loose its funding for special programs if they do so. What options do parents have if they do not want their kids in the Bilingual program? None. The school has not come up with a real Performance Plan and the Board does not give a heck about the options these students and their parents have. Yes it is personal in a sense that I am Hispanic and cannot stand the fact that in a rich District we are failing students just because we have the Union protecting teachers and the Board does not care about this minority group.

Comment_arrow

llwvrt

10:11 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Since the BOE chooses the curriculum and decides how it will be taught - tell them Alexa. The teachers are working with the materials the district ordered, teaching the students the way the district has directed, so if your issue is how bilingual is being handled - take it up with the BOE. What makes you think the teachers have any say in the matter? They don't make policy. Like I said- your issue seems to be personal. You haven't made any comments about this prior to contract issues being discussed. School has been in session since August and it is now Oct. 2. Did I miss one of your rants last year? Should I go and check board briefs for all the times you spoke at board meetings? If you have been working on this for the last four years and I missed it, I am sorry. Were you an Oak Terrace parent? (I wouldn't know).

Comment_arrow

Alexa Martinez

10:59 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

llwvrt, I know you are a teacher and not a parent, not even a community activist, you are just so on the side of teachers, you have to be one. And you are taking it too personal, that is why I know you are a teacher, ranting against me, it is not the way to go. Fix your school and then ask for raises.

Alexa Martinez

11:43 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Let's see how you all feel next year when the legislators finally pass a pension reform and shift the burden to the district.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

5:45 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

That is highly unlikely Alexa. I would suggest that you write your local representative(s) to share your sentiments.

Comment_arrow

Alexa Martinez

1:18 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

llwvrt, it is clear you are a teacher, out of touch and common sense. You are not aware of what is going on at the state, country level. Illinois is BROKE, local districts need to assume their responsibilities, more cases are coming out where the Board gives outrageous benefits to their teachers, superintendents, and public employees, the burden should be on the district/suburbs, not everyone pitching for everyones pension when we have no control. That is the reform that is coming your way, inevitable changes, like evaluations, we should start implementing evaluations, how do we know if we are paying the best teachers, or if its the parents that are doing all the work...apparently, it is not a matter of money, not in this rich district, with great installations, then why are teachers at Oak Terrace failing their students?

Comment_arrow

llwvrt

6:19 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Thank you for answering my question. It is personal. That explains a great deal. If you have a problem, I suggest you go to the District Office and request an appointment. If you have a valid complaint, I am sure that they will listen to you.

Ashley Howard

11:49 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

No worries...Lou is gonna step up...he loves paying those taxes. How much each month does a teacher pay forunion dues...and whT do they get fir the money? How much are the union leDers paid...and what are their benefits?
No mention of these items....

Reply

Lou

5:49 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Chi Lawyer, typical lawyer, when he has zero to say, he attacks the witness.Chi, are your kids getting a fantastic education? My kids are. They LOVE going to school, they LOVE learning, they look forward to the stimulating class discussions and assignments.Did they teach you to attack witnesses in law school, not working.You have a total lack of knowledge about THE teachers who are caring for and educating your children. My $55.00 a week is providing my kids the roots for learning that will last a lifetime. I LOVE paying these taxes that directly benefit MY children, the more the better.Chi, if you are repelled by higher taxes, remember who created the Iraq war based upon the myth of WMD, Republican President Bush.Where is your MONEY, ask Bush.Bush never raised taxes to pay for that LIE, he borrowed tons of money from the future, your money is paying for that big fat LIE.According to Professor Stiglitz, Iraq will cost $ 4 Trillion. Chi, focus! We are discussing HP education, not your total tax burden.I desire to pay for real, fantastic and verifiable education.What a bargain District 112 is. And Ashley, the biggest LAZY union in the world: the do-nothing highly paid U.S. Senate. A filibustering Republican minority controls the majority. Flibusters are not even mentioned in the Constitution! A total waste of tax money! Alexa, newly arrived kids take time to achieve.I HAPPILY pay about $ 7.53 a day for the greatest EDUCATION.It cost me more to park!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue Richman

5:59 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

how about keeping things relevant- I guess you belong to the "blame it on Bush" crowd

Concerned HPer

8:40 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Housing values are directly tied to the level of education. We in HP are used to our schools scoring at the top so we have become complacent. If East siders take a look at West HP they will see a different story. When we shoved 20 kids into a Red Oak School Kindergarten class with a first year teacher and no aid, the kids (as evidenced by test scores) that are now in middle school have consistently scored well below district averages because of the early deficit in reading and pre-reading skills. Red Oak has sunk from a top performing school to a bottom school because retiring teachers were replaced with cheap nubies and good teachers do not want to be there. That is what awaits all of HP if we don't get our act together and start investing more in our teachers and schools. The Board is clueless as to how their short-sighted actions will impact the long-term vibrancy of HP.

Reply

Ashley Howard

8:53 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

I' m still waiting to hear from Mark Stein about lowering those union dues and what the union leaders make. Why it's ok for the rest of us (responsible for paying for all) to be expected to take all the hits financially. If Lou wants to shoulder the burden go for it. Most people here have had pay freezes, and have to contribute to their health care packages.
My home value has taken a hit and my taxes have exploded.
If so many teachers or employees all want to work here....it must be a pretty good deal. Reality must be a player here

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Stein

12:38 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Sorry to burst you bubble but the members (teachers, support staff etc) set their own dues. The dues are set each year by their elected representatives to the IEA and NEA Representative Assemblies. Staff has absolutely no say in the setting of these amounts.

Ashley Howard

12:57 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

But how much are they?
And why aren't you making any cuts in those fees...perhaps that would give the teachers a greater increase....or make cutsin your own budget from the IEA or the NEA?
Seems like a viable alternative

Reply

Anon.

7:22 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

They are around $600 / year, Ashley - paid out of teacher's earnings. You obviously don't understand this has hardly any thing to do with the big picture.
The current offer on table offers just shy of that for HIGHLY educated teachers, veteran teachers, etc... as a "raise"
Incredible!

Reply

Alexa Martinez

11:07 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

I am so surprised how llwvrt is taking this matter so personal even to attack me with bullying. Sorry, you have not given any good argument about why the school Oak Terrace is failing the Hispanic students. I do have good arguments, it is poor management, bad programs and teachers full of excuses. Because the parents do not speak English, because the parents are poor, because the students do not know English, and now because the Board is the one that chooses the curriculum. It is not about curriculum, it is about effectively transitioning Spanish speakers into a fully immerse English program so these students can read and write and do math. And if the Bilingual teachers think the curriculum is not working or something is not working, they can surely speak out and perhaps go on strike for the issue, but it is not in their self interest, that means more work, they only care about money and benefits. Fix the school before we think about raises.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

11:20 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Nice try. The BOE and district administrators determine how to transition Spanish speakers into English speaking programs, not the teachers. That would be Dr. Giraldo, not the staff. You would have no clue as to how the staff feels about it because you are obviously not at Oak Terrace. I wish you much success in your quest.

Alexa Martinez

11:10 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

And llwvrt do not try to diminish the fact that Oak Terrace is failing the Hispanic poor students with your bullying towards me. Check the report card on the school, look at the stats and you will see the trend and the future we hold in the district if we do not get a handle on this issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llwvrt

11:24 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

As a parent, if I had actually relied on the results of ISAT/standardized testing as an accurate method of determining academic growth, I would have been disappointed. Standardized testing does not adequately show growth. The MAPS scores are a better indication of individual growth. And yes, I have been a member of the community for over 25 years, and raised 4 children here.

Comment_arrow

Mary T.

10:24 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

To blame teachers for a failing school is convenient but terribly in accurate. As we can all agree children go home to families and communities each day at which point responsibility shifts away from teachers. We are all responsible in some way.

Jesse L

11:43 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Some of the basic lessons taught in school and at home are perseverance..not to be a quitter, work thru the tough times, et. I find it very hypocritical of thee elementary teachers to "quit' the kids and community when they are not getting the raises they want..and must now (gasp) pay for a percentage of their health care. What kind of message is that to teach? How about the rest of us? the government has frozen salaries for 2 years...(as has mine in private enterprise)...and we must pay for our health care. Times are different, and the trough is not so full. I don't notice anyone running to other districts for jobs...because these are the best...time for a reality check...the taxpayers here are drowning

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lou

7:06 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Jesse, the taxpayers are "drowning" because our tax money was thrown at a contrived war in Iraq and its expensive consequences. Bush wasted 4 Trillion Dollars (according to Nobel Prize winning Professor A. Stiglitz) of our dollars and not one weapon of mass destruction was found since 2003, nine years ago. 4 Trillion could have paid for ALL of our teachers' salaries in America. Bush decentralized the entire Middle East, allowed Al Qaeda to gain a secure foothold in Iraq and the Middle East. Because of Mr. Bush's blunders, our tax money will be used to squelch Al Qaeda in Libya, Syria, Egypt, and Lebanon for decades. THAT is where your tax money is, it's not in teachers' pockets. That's why the taxpayers are drowning. By the way, the US spends 809 Billion dollars a year on education according to the University of Southern California. Compare that amount of money to the 4 Trillion dollars we blew in Iraq! mat.usc.edu/u-s-education-versus-the-world-infographic/

llwvrt

6:16 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

I guess you didn't read all of the proposals Jesse - the teachers have no problem with paying for health care. Different issues are at stake. I guess it is just easier to say "bad teachers" rather than wonder what exactly is the BOE trying to do. And what they aren't telling you.
http://district112teachers.org/

Reply

Chilawyer

7:17 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Lou,

I have attacked your argument, which makes your purported desire to pay more taxes a central theme. That is not an ad hominem attack. An ad hominem attack would be calling you a weak-minded numbskull, and I have not done that.

Cordially,

Chilawyer

Reply

Tony S

5:45 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

What is not being talked about here is the false misrepresentation of the numbers by District CFO Moshin Dada. You can make numbers do and say anything if you are clever enough. The fact is that the District is NOT broke, and actually netted a SURPLUS of $2 mil over the course of the previous contract, which was negotiated with significant concessions by the teachers. The economic data currently being shoved down our throats by Dada is old and misleading.

Reply

Ashley Howard

7:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I have tried to read all I can from the BOE and the teacher's position. I must agree with Ed Brill, that it is difficult to understand lanes, steps.
One thing I fo NOT understand is why the administrative salaries (in both 112 and 113) are not under a microscope? Check out their benefits?
Yes, we all must tighten our belts...but WHY do these people get a front seat at the trough...benefits etc. To boot? Why isn't this brought up. Or am I missing that

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walter White

8:45 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Administrators work very hard at keeping their raise and benefit structures away from public view. It's there, but very hard to find. The reason is that they are afforded many, many fringe benefits that would sicken most people.

Ashley Howard

7:22 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

No one is gonna get all they want..but why are those admin. People making way north of 250000 plus benefits? I betcha they got increases...so why isn't anyone looking in this direction?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walter (Tripp) Hainsfurther

11:17 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

In fact, Ashley, the Board gave the Superintendent a bonus last year and the Business Manager is the king of double dipping, collecting a huge pension along with his salary.

Tony S

7:43 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

I'm a recent college grad an I can tell you that the brilliant people nowadays do not go into education. Why would you, when teachers are completely undervalued by the media and many commenters here? Meanwhile, STEM jobs go to qualified candidates from foreign countries with much better education systems, that by the way, VALUE teachers appropriately. You need the best of the best to prepare children to compete in a global economy.

By the way, if you don't think teachers are undervalued, all you have to do is look to Moshin Dada, who said teachers won't understand his numbers anyways. If the BOE wins this one, you'll be lucky if teachers a few years down the road will be able to put 2 and 2 together.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David R.

9:08 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Tony, your correct that we need the best teachers possible to prepare them for the global economy, but your suggestion that "brillant" college graduates made up a large constiuency of our teachers is wrong,:
"As measured by standardized test scores (mainly the SAT and the ACT), students choosing to major in education tend to be drawn from the lower end of the ability distribution. In Who Will Teach?, Harvard University professor of education Richard Murnane and his colleagues write: “College graduates with high test scores are less likely to take [teaching] jobs, employed teachers with high test scores are less likely to stay, and former teachers with high test scores are less likely to return.” On average, according to the findings of University of Massachusetts economist Dale Ballou, the higher the quality of an individual’s undergraduate institution, the less likely a student is to choose a teaching career. Moreover, during the past 25 years the share of master’s and doctoral degrees in education granted by top-tier public and private research universities has declined dramatically. And of students who graduated from college in 1993 and 1994, data from the Baccalaureate and Beyond survey show that those who entered the public school teaching profession averaged a 923 on the SATs; the average SAT of those entering other professions was about 80 points higher.

Comment_arrow

Tony S

12:31 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

David, please re-read what I wrote. Thank you for concurring and providing relevant data to support my claim.

Why would the best and brightest to into a field that it so undervalued?

Comment_arrow

David R.

2:13 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Tony, I don't think teachers are undervalued in 112, but they probably are in many parts of the country. However, I was responding to your comment about "nowadays," and the study shows that there was never a time that the highest achievers consistently became schools teachers. In order get the best and brightest, which includes attracting more men to the profession, we need to make the compensation, benefits and working conditions more on par with private sector. That means much higher pay (at least for starting teachers), but, in turn, defined benefit plans, removal of seniority rights, further reducing tenure protections, and potentially a longer school year (with several breaks). In short, the teachers can't have it both ways--protections and benefits that few other professionals have and six-figure or near six-figure compensation.

NS

1:31 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Perhaps, Tony, some of the best and brightest simply want to help others.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry Hopkins

9:22 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

NS, I think that it Tony's point. Sure, "some of the best and brightest simply want to help others." Therefore, why would we want to show them a system where promises are broken (yes, you board) and compensation and benefits are under attack. Juniors, Senior and recent college grads who have been considering education must be rethinking their futures...yes, even the best and brightest.

Tony, well said. Although you are witnessing things starting to get a little heated, if education is something you are considering, hopefully this won't permanently tarnish your thoughts. Not all boards hire hatchet men and treat their teachers like objects. Not all boards and admin go on the attack and take advantage. Some handle things with class. Stick around!

Pamela Kramer

10:42 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

Just an FYI. Oak Terrace is not failing its students. Nor are the other schools who didn't make AYP like HPHS and all three middle schools. We are in good company there. And, Oak Terrace's MAP scores show a higher percentage of our students exceeding their goals than in most of the other 112 schools. That means that although they may come to the table with less, they are gaining more than those who come with more (perhaps from more affluent situations). Of course, they do have more to make up, that's true. Oak Terrace is making up the gap -- not in one year, maybe -- each and every year. And I am proud to be an Oak Terrace teacher. And yes, I am bilingual. The teachers at Oak Terrace choose to work there rather than in schools where the need is less. We love what we do and we are good at it. That's apparent when students are disappointed that there is a day off -- they'd rather be in school!

Reply

Alexa Martinez

4:22 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Pamela, I do not belive your poor explanation. Oak Terrace has been on the watch list for over 5 years. Under the no child left behind and Obama plan your school is failing. If the rich students parents like to diregard the results from the tests, that is their problem, and the real problem we have is people like you that sugar coat a reality: 4 students out of 10 do not know how to read, write and math. You should be ashamed, mostly because you are in charge of reading and you are failing, and you call yourself a "bilingual" teacher, ja, then I am wonderwoman! Perhaps you should train dogs instead of teaching kids how to read, you might have better results. Your school will go under, and all those bilingual teachers are bringin the school under and starting to affect other schools that you feed into.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott

11:40 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

Rich parents wait huh? Do you even live in the community? Oak Terrace has 71% of its students from low income families. A large portion of these students come from immigrant families that don't speak English at home. If you look at the test scores broken down by race (for lack of a better way of trying to separate immigrant families from multi generational American families) you will find a HUGE difference in test scores. What does this show? It shows more or less that children from poorer families that don't speak English at home tend to struggle more than children of wealthier families that speak English at home. I think you will find this situation is not unique to Oak Terrace. You really ought to be ashamed of what you wrote to Pamela as people like her chose to work with a more challenging group of children and really have a tougher time with their students than the schools that "test so well".

Alexa Martinez

4:25 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Of course Pamela will say nothing is wrong and try to. Sugar coat the situation @ Oak Terrace, her self interest is to retire with a fat pension, regardles of the childrens future.

Reply

Alexa Martinez

4:31 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

And the administrators should not get raises or bonus for two reasons, same rule should apply to them as to teachers, the economy is not good, save the money, and because under their watch they have decided to look over the shoulder and let the problem we have @ Oak Terrace escalate, now we have Northwood second year failing too. It is their duty to make crucial decisions that will mitigate the problem. Snobs, get in charge and make the appropriate decisions, shut down the bilingual program and start evaluating teachers. What are you waiting for, so someone takes over the school or for a civil lawsuit?

Reply

llwvrt

1:49 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Alexa, nothing is going to happen because realistic test scores show that students are improving. ISAT scores are not a solid example of academic growth and that is what AYP is based on. Illinois will get an exemption, like so many other states, when they revamp their plan to the government. If you really detest the way bilingual education is taught, do your research and show how immersion is both cost cutting and effective. Present it to the board. They listen to discussions that save them money. Every family at Oak Terrace had the option to leave; they chose to stay. Imagine that- they chose to stay at Oak Terrace. I wonder why?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Stein

3:02 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

The billingual program is the Board's program. It is not the NSEA's program. The Association has no power to alter the program. If you believe that immersion is the best way to go, you need to convince the Board and administration. You may be surprised to learn that there are teachers who will agree with you.

Comment_arrow

Alexa Martinez

11:04 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

The parents at Oak Terrace are not choosing to stay, they just do not have another option. Have you ever called the school and tried to enroll a Hispanic student? The first thing they do is to send you to Mr. Giraldo and he makes sure you are all scared that if you do not enroll your child in the bilingual program, the school will loose all financial aid and you too. which is not true, but the school is not informing parents about their options. Hispanic parents do not want their kids to be stuck in a bilingual program, they want their kids to learn ENGLISH. and when I say that the bilingual program does not work is because it does not, it does not even teach proper Spanish. The bilingual teachers do not have a good handle of the Spanish nor the English language, they mask it and since the Principal doe not speak Spanish, she does not know that Giraldo is covering for their mistakes. Yes I get all your arguments, but this is a VERY RICH SCHOOL DISTRICT and I have seen better results at more t modest schools. It is just a matter of making the effort and getting rid of the bilingual program.

Leave a comment