patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mayor Updates City About Theater

Nancy Rotering outlines short-term and long-term plan for Highland Park Theatre.

 

What's Happening with the Highland Park Theater?

There is a short-term answer and there is a long-term answer.

Short-Term

As you know, the city-owned Highland Park Movie Theatre was closed May 5, 2012 for fire safety reasons that included non-functional sprinklers, insufficient emergency lighting and emergency exits.

Want Highland Park news in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Patch's newsletter.

Our goal is to re-open a safe theater as quickly as possible. However, making the theater safe will cost money and we must be reasonable with our resources.  We will assess how much it will cost to reopen the Theater and determine if it is fiscally responsible to invest your money in a facility that has an uncertain future.

City Manager Dave Knapp has been working with an independent fire safety engineer to help us assess our options.  A full report of his recommendations and estimated costs is expected within the next few weeks. 

Upon receipt of the report, the Council will do a cost analysis and discuss the pros and cons associated with our short-term desire to quickly reopen the Theater and the long-term potential project discussed below.   

Long-Term 

Last fall, the City put the Theater out for a Request for Proposal (RFP).  After reviewing the variety of responses received, the Council directed our Community Development Director to commence discussions with the group that submitted the most appropriate and economically advantageous proposal. While transparency is always our goal, the details of the proposal and negotiations must remain confidential for the time being while specifics relating to the negotiations are ironed out.

Unique aspects of this project exceed the capabilities of a municipality finance department.  On Monday night, June 11, 2012, the Council voted to hire a financial assessment consulting group that specializes in complex financial transactions such as the one proposed, to assist us with the disposition of the Theater. They will analyze the feasibility of the project and the qualifications of the developer.

During the closed Executive Session of our Committee of the Whole meeting on June 25, 2012, we will discuss a proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to be entered into with the developer. This document will outline the conditions of the project negotiations. 

If the Council concludes that the project is of interest, the proposal will be vetted over the course of this next year through our standard channels, beginning with the Plan Commission and Design Review Commission conducting public hearings and analyses followed by City Council action.

Stay tuned.

Nancy Rotering
Highland Park Mayor 

For more news and updates, "like" us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

About this column: Have an opinion you'd like to share? Send it to jacob@patch.com Related Topics: Highland Park City Council, Highland Park Theatre, Highland Park Theatre closes, and Nancy Rotering

Chilawyer

7:03 am on Thursday, June 14, 2012

The Highland Park Theater fiasco illustrates the failure of suburban socialism. We the People, through our public safety services, have to close a theater that We the People bought for $2 million through the improvident decisions of our elected public officials. In the meantime, south of socialist Highland Park, in capitalist Wilmette, private ownership of the Wilmette Theater has resulted in a combined movie/performing arts theater that is up to code.

So long as Highland Parkers continue to elect "visionary" suburban socialists, we will continue to suffer the fiscal consequences of their hubris, including the highest real estate taxes on the North Shore.

Reply

The Q

2:16 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

you are correct in your analysis.......

Reply

David Greenberg

7:35 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

Thanks for the detailed update, and willingness to do the cost analysis Mayor. I'd say that if the Theater can't make 100% of it's operational, maintenance, and future replacement costs - we ought not to re-open it.

A re-development, where the City divests itself of the property would be nice. Especially if the developer assumes all of the costs for dealing with the property.

Reply

Leave a comment