Olian Pleads for Late Nite Highland Park
Former councilwoman asks for $12,000 to save entertainment program.
Late Nite Highland Park came close to becoming a budget cutting casualty before former Councilwoman Terri Olian made a plea to the City Council during it's last meeting.
Funds for Late Nite Highland Park, a program that provides entertainment at many local establishments throughout the city, were originally going to come from the allocation to the Downtown Business Alliance.
Read more: Young Performers Show Off at Talent Show
Olian, who started the program six years ago as a way to showcase the city's young talent, told the Council that without a $12,000 allotment in the city budget the program could not continue.
“Funding should not come out of the Alliance budget,” Olian said. “I request the $12,000 from 2011 be put in the 2012 budget. Without that I will be unable to continue and that will be the end of Late Nite Highland park.”
After Olian spoke, Councilmen Paul Frank, Daniel Kaufman and Steve Mandel expressed support for the proposal. After the regularly scheduled meeting, the Council considered the subject at its budget workshop.
At that session Councilman Jim Kirsch asked Olian to prepare a budget, which she promised to do for the Council’s consideration at its next budget workshop Monday. Olian also stressed Late Nite Highland Park is a city-wide project and not limited to the central business district.
“I needed to hear from them it was a city initiative and it is worthwhile,” Olian said. “It is not just downtown entertainment. When you promote Highland Park, you promote all of Highland Park.”
The next day Mayor Nancy Rotering met with city Economic Development Assistant Carolyn Hersh to help find ways to meet Late Nite Highland Park’s needs. “We worked on a multi-pronged approach to accomplish what is desired,” Rotering said.
Budget matters continue
With the Council tentatively scheduled to vote on a final 2012 budget at its Nov. 28 meeting, it held a public hearing on the proposal. Finance Director Elizabeth Holleb made a formal presentation of the budget first released Sept. 28.
Holleb gave details of proposed revenue sources and expenditures which are available in complete detail on Highland Park’s website.
Commission slots filled
Rotering also appointed more than 30 people to Highland Park’s boards and commissions. Alyssa Knobel was named chair of the Business and Economic Development Commission with Robert Goldstein serving as vice chair. Two new members are Brent Weiss and Robert Mintz.
Bruce Farrell Dorn was reappointed chair of the Board of Police and Fire Commissioners. Mimi Brin and Robert Baizer were renamed members.
James Lynch was reappointed to the Cultural Arts Commission and named chair. Mary Jo Papich, Catherine Ricciardelli and Abby Neumann will also serve. Nancy Hannick will be vice chair of the Design Review Commission.
The Healthy Highland Park Task Force will be chaired by Edye Wagner and Roni Weiss. Dr. Gerald Burke, Mary Jo Lndl, Dr. Albert Miller, Hania Fuschette and Corrinne Bronson-Adatto will also serve.
Jean Sogin will become chair of the Historic Preservation Commission and Gerald Fradin will be vice chair. Also serving are Judy Bramson and Mary Curran. Jakee Miller, James Irwin and Janet Bernstein will be part of the Human Relations Commission.
David Putlak and Jeanni McCormick are now on the Joint Plan Commission while Donald Matthews will serve on the Natural Resources Commission. Debra Rubin is the new chair the Plan Commission with Bill Dytrych as vice chair and Adam Stolberg as a member.
The Ravinia Festival Community Relations Commission will have Barbara Borden as its vice chair. New members are Ramona Choos and David Newman.
Dr. Stephen Rheinstrom will continue as chair of the Transportation Commission with Richard Hocking acting as vice chair. New members are Phil Glick, Kim Stone, Sally Higginson and Peg Laaemle.
Bennett Klasky was reappointed to the Zoning Board of Appeals and named its new chairman. John Doherty will be vice chair while David Fettner and Mark Muller will also serve.
forest barbieri
8:43 am on Monday, November 28, 2011
Thanks Terri for your continued support of our community and most certainly Late Nite Highland Park is something that enriches the community and helps make our town the vibrant small northshore town that it is. Just yesterday, I was showing my visiting parents Port Clinton Square and "bragging " about the activities held there!
Terri Olian
11:00 am on Monday, November 28, 2011
Thanks, Forest. Late Nite HP has evolved from an initiative that was started to provide safe activities for youth into an initiative that is all about providing and promoting something unique on the North Shore -- live entertainment that takes place on a regular basis in many HP businesses (and Port Clinton Square in the summer months) -- and through it, supporting our businesses and community as a whole. For the past 6 years, LN has provided innumerable performance opportunities for youth and adults; has brought HP and non-HP residents to restaurants to dine, socialize, and be entertained; has been recognized as a model program by other communities; and, has strengthened city partnerships with our schools, park district, and many HP arts & cultural organizations. For the last 5 years, LNHP has also provided the city's 4th of July entertainment with the Late Nite HP Bitter Jester Battle of the Bands, which Nic DeGrazia runs. While both of us donate all of our time to coordinate our parts of the initiative, city funds are needed to sustain it. As requested, Nic and I presented a detailed budget to the Council at their budget meeting on Nov. 21, which they approved. Of the total requested ($15,655), $6,500 will be used to support the year-round initiative; the remainder will go toward 4th of July expenses ($8,455) and the June Friday night Battles of the Bands ($700), which leads to the 4th of July finale.
Larry Jones
11:29 am on Monday, November 28, 2011
Teri:
You are sorely missed on the Council!
Daniel
2:08 pm on Monday, November 28, 2011
Who cares about Late Night Highland Park? Probably the local businesses that benefit from it. Let them pay the 12k, give me a tax break.
Bryce Robertson
8:05 pm on Monday, November 28, 2011
Daniel: comments from people like you just make me worry about how many uninformed residents we have living in Highland Park. Late Nite was started to help give local students somewhere safe to go on Friday and Saturday nights. The result was a program that grew into something that attracted first students, and then adults from our community as well as neighboring ones (from as far as Evanston!), giving our downtown a fairly major bump in activity level on the weekends. Late Nite has sponsored countless events within Highland Park, most of which was coordinated by volunteers. There is a student task force at HPHS, of which I am a part, that organizes many of the "events" sponsored by Late Nite (not including concerts). Free advertising on behalf of the businesses is a perk given to them for participating in providing entertainment and staying open MUCH later than they typically would on a weekend. Re: your tax break comment, do the math. Taking the $16K that Terri mentioned above and removing it from the 2012 budget would save the average HP homeowner roughly 36 cents per year. Count only the Late Nite stuff (unless you want to eliminate the 4th of July celebration), and it knocks down to about 15 cents per year. If that's too much for you to pay to support downtown economic development, let me know. I'll be happy to pitch in. Otherwise, be proud that you live in a community that cares about its youth and its downtown areas.
Larry Jones
8:52 pm on Monday, November 28, 2011
Bryce
Don't waste your time with guys like Daniel, he's only tring to get your goat and others who know what a great thing Late Night Highland Park is
David Greenberg
4:49 am on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
If "Late Night Highland Park" doesn't net the City more than it costs us, we should not fund it. If the downtown businesses feel it's worthwhile, let them fund it. The "safe programming for kids" aspect - that can be financed and provided for privately as well, no need for the taxpayers to fund any of it because it's ultimately up to the parents/guardians of the kids to provide activities for them. Besides the supposedly "safe environment" for kids, we hear about the alleged benefits of Late Night Highland Park - there's plenty of negative effects as well, but we never hear about those - noise from the bands that can often be heard more than a mile away for one.
Daniel
8:57 am on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I agree with you David. Since when is it governments role to pay for late night activities for kids and adults? If its such a great program then there should be no problem funding it privately. Ill keep my 36 cents and spend it how I want to. Don't need big brother spending entertainment dollars on my behalf.
Ed Brill
9:01 am on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Yeah, the government certainly shouldn't pay for parades, fireworks, beaches, parks, playgrounds or anything else that provides entertainment.
Bob Levi
9:18 am on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Economic Development is key to the health of any village, town or city. The more people outside of our city who might otherwise not visit HP is essential to maintaining a strong sales tax revenue stream in these tough economic times. Most retail businesses are struggling today. I'm sure the ROI on the $16,000 spent by the city on LNHP far exceeds the investment. As a business consultant, I've seen too many businesses fail when they micromanage expenses and don't take action to increase revenues. The same concept works for municipalities.
David Greenberg
2:07 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
As with all things, there's a balance to be struck in expenditures v. expected ROI. Your gut may say that the $16K is worth the investment, but what proof do you have of that? We've all heard too many times that the expense is worth it, but we've never seen the supporting data.
I'm not trying to be xenophobic, but there's a cost incurred from external visitors - roads/increased traffic, Police/Fire protection, water, sanitation, additional parking needs, etc. If those visitors aren't covering at least 100% of those costs, then the taxpayers end up paying for it.
Paul Smith
4:00 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
"I'm not trying to be xenophobic". Except you are.
Thanks to Terri for keeping the focus on economic development going (even if it means dreaded external visitors coming to town to spend their money.)
David Greenberg
7:51 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
By all means - come on by, spend money. But if the revenues that the City reaps from sales tax don't cover the costs created by the visitors, that impacts taxpayers. As I asked - let's see the proof that the expenditure is worth it. This activity has been going on for a few years now, there should be some data available.
James M. Lynch
6:26 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Terri;
Great project and a worthwhile investment in our city. We have a great city but need to keep telling people from other towns WHY it's great, including our many cultural activities, family friendly events, interesting and unique shops, great food and more. When people consider leaving Chicago and heading to the 'burbs to raise children, Late Night, our lakefront, our Parks facilities, and our other cultural choices will encourage them to consider moving here over other cities they might choose. Keeping a city vibrant, attractive and current is a shared 'trust', for the city and it's inhabitants and the time you and Nic donate in effort is a huge value that's not mentioned here in dollars, but if everyone in the community rolled up their sleeves the way you and so many others do, we'd see continued growth and prosperity for our city. Thanks to you for this great program and for the council working so hard to keep it intact.
James.
Paul Smith
8:46 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
David – can’t get my head around the concept of why or how a city would only allow residents to shop at its stores or restaurants. This must be a first in urban planning: discouraging tourists or visitors under the idea that tax revenues from residents are somehow more valuable than tax revenues from non-residents.
David Greenberg
9:18 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Paul - I never said that a City should only allow its residents to shop at its stores/restaurants. What I said is that if the City, and by extension, the Taxpayers of Highland Park, is being asked to fund late night entertainment under the premise that it will make more money than it costs, then let's see the proof. If it's not bringing in at least what it costs, then the taxpayers shouldn't be asked to fund it.