How to attract customers to Businesses in Highland Park? Part 4.

Businesses owners and leaders maybe need to choose main directions to develop plans for  future of the Highland Park economy.

In my opinion, different forms of tourism are the best directions. We have many opportunities here:

1. Attraction of  more people from Great Chicago area is the cheapest direction. Good reliable transportation between train stations of Highland Park, Deerfield, Buffalo Grove, Palatine, etc could be useful for all people leaving in Great Chicago areas, which have connections with Chicago by train, and no connections between train lines. Highland Park authority and business leaders could be initiators of this new business, which will connect many areas of Great Chicago and, of course, attract more people (more customers) to Highland Park.

2. We need pay more attention on sites, which offer Highland Park to the USA and world population. As I mention before if you ask your computer, perhaps: Highland Park, IL and Victoria - Victoria sites are ten times better.

3. We have the best connections with Botanic Garden, Ravinia, Chicago. At the same time we have not friendly for not resident policy  for parking cars on the beaches. Of course, we haven't enough places to park cars there. Regular public transportation to all beaches, to Fort Sheridan could help attract people to Highland Park.

4. We could create excursions to many interesting historic buildings, unique architectures, which we have in Highland Park.

5. We could build more hotels, motels for people, which will enjoy concerts in Ravinia, exhibitions in Botanic Garden, who want to be in Chicago.

We have another possibilities for businesses in Highland Park and especially in Illinois as state.

We have huge mistake in SCIENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE.

This mistake is responsible for most economical problems in the world and USA. Problems with economy in USA, of course, influence economy in Highland Park.

Please, be patient and reevaluate this deadly wrong science, which advised to government in the world windmills, solar cells to reduce amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere - the worst solutions as for economy, as for environment.

What we are putting in computer model: temperature, humidity, speed and directions of wind, etc.
We never put amount of greenhouse gases.
Why we think that greenhouse gases are responsible for climate change?
Richard Muller: increasing of temperature is similar to increasing of amount of greenhouse gases.
Dear Mr. Muller and your followers,
Industrial revolution begins in 1800.
We use mostly fossil source of energy to build roads, cities with their urban effects.
We cut 4,000,000,000 acres of forests for fields to produce food for growing population (it is area ~ equal of two areas of USA.) It reduces evaporation of water over all continents with arable land, reduce humidity in air and probabilities of rains.
Is it a cooling the atmosphere or is it warming factors?
We increase black carbon on surface of white snow in winter time, which reduce reflection of direct sun radiation to the space.
Is it a cooling the atmosphere or is it warming factor?

Theory that greenhouse gases are responsible for climate change is the most dangerous mistake in today science, which will bring to world population more damage than WW1 & WW2 did together.

We must reevaluate this deadly wrong science as soon as possible.

Please, think about properties of water, about clouds, their height, about differences in molecular mass of methane and water vapor from one side and carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and twenty even more heavier greenhouse gases.

Please, think about these factors, which we change during industrial revolution.
Please, think that all these changes are proportional to increasing amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, because we did them by using fossil sources of energy in most cases.