.

Tax Protesters Make Good Points

The simple message to reduce spending isn't vague; it's helpful.

For months I've been curious about the newly organized Citizens for Property Tax Relief (CPTR). To be honest, I winced when a member first asked me to sign one of the group's petitions, which demands "immediate and long-term property tax relief from all public taxing bodies."

I was asked on my way into a park district board meeting in late August. All of us were there to express our frustrations to the board about the that had just come to light. Yet, I hesitated to sign a petition that broadly asked both our school boards, our city council and the park board to simply "reduce our taxes" without a single specific request. I thought the statement itself was vague, simplistic and naively pointed out an obvious problem.

I didn't sign it, and I told the petitioner why. I had the same reaction the second time I was asked to sign it. In the back of my mind I started to wonder, "Are these guys legitimate, or are they just crazy?"

I once worked in the constituent service office of a state legislator. The hard-working staff in those offices, and the legislators themselves, tend to group all the phone calls they get into any number of categories. Inevitably, every office has its own branding mechanism for coding "those" types of calls: "crazy," "nut-ball," "anti-government," etc. 

Those labels may be practical for sorting out the phone messages for a busy legislator, but they also do that lawmaker a disservice by enabling them to essentially ignore the real concerns of citizens – the same way that I nearly did to the CPTR members.

After talking with some of the members of CPTR, I've realized that its members need to be listened to, not dismissed like some angry cranks. The ones I have spoken with aren't anti-schools or anti-government; they just want better decisions to be made about public spending. We all should.

Despite my initial dismissals, CPTR hasn't gone away, and in the months since August it has organized further. The group insists that it is intentionally not telling our local boards where or how to cut. I now see that doing so makes a good point, not a vague one.

Members of CPTR tell our boards and city council, "You've got to attempt to reduce our property tax burden, because at the current levels it isn't possible for some in our community to stay here."  I don't know how widespread that belief is, or if it is based in reality, but I did recently meet a senior couple who told me they were unable to sell their home partially because of Highland Park's extremely high property taxes. 

One key point that a CPTR organizer mentioned struck a chord with me. Our local taxing bodies need to communicate better and collaborate more. Each of our two , our , our and others should not each move to raise property taxes for their own priorities and do so as if they are operating in a vacuum. Each one of them impacts our property taxes, and multiple increases have compounding effects for all of us as taxpayers.

Earlier this year I wrote that Democrats and television talking heads ignored the Tea Party activists at their own peril. Many Democrats were hoping so badly that the Tea Party represented only gun-toting, Dixie flag waving extremists that they actually ignored the core issue represented by this surge of citizen activism: taxes. 

All of the candidates for office in the upcoming election (myself included), and our other office holders would be wise to talk to some of the CPTR members and pay attention to what they represent. 

David Greenberg December 20, 2010 at 09:24 PM
I signed the petition because I agree that the overall burden is too high and they all contribute to the problem. To tell each taxing body how to cut their budget would result in multiple petitions, or a petition that was so long that no one would read it and sign it. So they cut to the chase - "Mr. Taxing Body: This is Your Responsibility. Figure It Out. Make It Happen. Cut Your Budget. Lower Our Taxes." People like Mr. Cohen on the Dist 113 Board like to dismiss the it as a "generic petition signed by some people" - but that's entirely wrong. It's a specific petition that tells them exactly what they have to do, and it's signed by over 3000 tax payers who are fed up with the tax burden and who can no longer afford it. Thats about 10% of the taxpayers here in Highland Park. That the Park District and Dist 112 are reducing their levies is admirable and appreciated. The City has tried hard, but hasn't yet bitten the bullet and cut theirs - it's going up over 2% this year. And District 113 - well, we all know they're asking for $168.8 million to fund their pipe dreams - so they obviously haven't been listening. As with the Democrats not paying heed to the Tea Party, and now blinking in the light after the elections - I seriously hope that everyone on the existing boards who have voted to increase taxes gets voted out and replaced with fiscally conservative individuals who listen to their constituents.
Samantha Stolberg December 20, 2010 at 10:46 PM
Any candidate (Council, School, Parks, etc.) who encourages more open dialogue and cooperation between the City's governing bodies has my vote. It is the current hands-off attitude that is the most taxing.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »