The 18-year-old Highland Park resident who crashed her car into a family on Labor Day, killing a 5-year-old girl, formally denied that she huffed a cleaning product before the crash Thursday, the Chicago Tribune reports.
Jaclyn Santos-Sacramento: The Story So Far
Carly Rousso stood quietly in court on Thursday as her lawyer entered not guilty pleas for her charges of reckless homicide and aggravated driving under the influence, according to NBC Chicago.
Let Patch save you time. Get more Highland Park news like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone with our free newsletter. Sign up here.
Rousso was driving eastbound on Central Avenue on Labor Day afternoon . Jaclyn Santos-Sacramento, 5, was killed.
Toxicology reports indicate that the compound Difluoroethane was detected in Rousso's blood, according to the grand jury indictment. The compound was found in a commercial cleaning product uncovered in Rousso's car, according to Ken LaRue, the Lake County State's Attorney's Traffic Division chief.
If convicted on all charges, Rousso could go to prison for a maximum of 26 years, the Tribune reports. Her trial date has been set for Feb. 1.
For more news and updates, "like" us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
Even if one is guilty, it isn't un-American or wrong or "an outrage" to plead not guilty and have a trial where all the facts can come out - it's a constitutional right.
And to Christine Benton calling Carly a pig? A pig? Really, Christine? That's the best comment/thought you could conjure up? Your comment is that of a 5-year-old. I'm not defending Carly; I'm merely looking at this from all angles and shaking my head at the idiotic comments from those lashing out in irrational thoughts.
the face
Bob: Did I say something that offended you?
I'm not certain why you find it necessary to attack persons who happen to disagree with you.
Yes, some elected officials have made their decisions, but not all. And the right of the People to air their grievances before THEIR Government is part of due process. Sure I agreed with the D112 School Board's position, what's wrong with that? Some other people also fell on both sides of the fence, and others hadn't decided either way. Again, nothing wrong with any of it.
There was a DustOff canister found in her car, but did she do it while driving, before driving, or at some point earlier in time? DustOff is reported to cause some odd problems with the user's central nervous system and even bone growth as a result of usage. These problems could have been caused by abuse of the DustOff, and manifested while she was driving even though she didn't inhale while driving or shortly before driving. She could have fallen during a previous use of DustOff, had a concussion, and that could have caused the accident. Testing for this substance is difficult - so it's really up to the State to prove that they crossed their t's and dotted their i's when collecting the sample and then testing it. If they didn't, that's a problem for the State's case and does also exacerbate this tragic situation. But since innocence is assumed and guilt must be proven, the burden is on the State - if they don't get it right, the evidence could be thrown out, and then we have a death and severe injuries to contend with - but it may not be chargeable as a criminal case, and it may boil down to the resolution of a Civil case (which has a lower burden of proof since there's no criminal penalties that apply).
Carly has pled not guillty, at the direction of her counsel, just as any other person charged with a serious crime pleads not guilty. Her lawyers need time to try to reach a plea bargain. That is probably futile in his case, because of the notoriety of the case, Jacylyn's young age, and the unwillingness of an affluent suburban family to accept the fact that their daughter will be incarcerated for many years.
There is only one person who can testify in support of the hypothetical excuses you have laid out for Carly, and that is Carly. Her lawyer will never let her testify, so the excuses will never come in. Explanations do not present themselves, they have to come in through witnesses. Before you continue your unwarranted attacks on "incompetent" state's attorneys and "low IQ judges" (your fervor is starting to suggest you have had some unsuccessful experiences with the legal system), try spelling "falicious" correctly -- it's fallacious.