Two sets of recommendations were presented to the District 113 Board of Education on Monday night. , the other came as a surprise.
Want Highland Park news in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Patch's newsletter.
David Brint and presented the leadership team's findings during Monday's meeting. The two have worked on the leadership team over the past year -- since shortly after -- to figure out what needs and Deerfield High Schools face and when each of those needs should be addressed.
100 volunteers, 5 committees, 1 year
During the past year, Brint and Hainsfurther explained, over 100 volunteers, including five different study groups, took several tours of the high schools. They also visited neighboring high schools, met with engineers and architects and to figure out what projects the district should prioritize going forward.
"When this process started I didn't have a beard, and I had hair," Hainsfurther jokedd at the opening of his discussion.
The presentation offered general guidelines the school board should keep in mind as it begins mulling over ways to address its needs. For example, Hainsfurther and Brint made clear that the leadership team believes needs should be prioritized in terms of urgency and addressed in a cost-efficient manner. One slide in the Power Point read that projects should focus on "function not flash."
"We're not looking for these facilities to be the Taj Mahal," Hainsfurther said. "We want them to function."
From need to have to nice to have
The leadership team also divided school needs into tiers in order to distinguish importance. Tier one includes fixing parts of the school that are suffering in core ways. The pools in both schools were an example of a tier one project.
"The pools have reached the end of their useful life," Hainsfurther said. "They are not worth putting money into, in the opinion of the study group."
Hainsfurther was quick to point out, however, that the leadership team didn't have any suggestions to make once the needs were acknowledged.
"What [the pools] get replaced with is an open question," Hainsfurther said. "There are all sorts of ways to solve problems, that's not our job."
Because the report didn't mention solutions to the district's needs, it also didn't mention costs. The lack of detail did not go unnoticed by some of the residents in attendance.
"I'm very disappointed by the lack of specificity in the recommendations that came from this effort," said Steven Narrod, who spoke after Brint's and Hainsfurther's presentation. He encouraged the board to accelerate the process.
"We're covering the same ground, we need to pick up the pace," Narrod said.
Some of the board members, however, were pleased with the report. praised the presentation for its precision.
"It seemed like every [need] was important in the previous plan, but this plan is much more clear," Sandlow said.
Education First presents plan
The second presentation was made unofficially by Sam Shapiro, who recently stepped down. He spoke on behalf of , the group that opposed the district's referendum last April.
"What we saw tonight actually is not a better plan," Shapiro said about the first presentation. He then submitted a packet that outlines a proposal that is estimated at $30.9 million for infrastructure and $22.9 million for vocational and physical education. He said his biggest problem with the plan presented earlier was that it didn't include any costs.
"You're not able to make trade offs when you're not able to discuss costs," Shapiro said. "You lose creativity."
Deerfield resident Harry Steindler spoke after Shapiro and was handed a copy of Shapiro's proposal. He echoed Narrod's concerns that this process might be moving too slowly.
"We need to get going," Steindler said. "Reflection is important… but we can't take too much time."
An interim report
According to Brint, the missing details in Monday night's leadership report will be filled in over time.
"This is just an interim report," Brint said at the beginning of his presentation. Hainsfurther called it a summary of what the committee thinks are the most urgent priorities.
Sandlow said that study groups like the leadership team were not going anywhere, and that they would reconvene occasionally. agreed.
"As we go through this process we will have periodic updates with the board," he said.
Editor's note: This article originally stated the Education First proposal as costing $30 million. The actual cost is is estimated at $30.9 million for infrastructure and $22.9 million for Vocational and Physical Education. Patch apologizes for the error.
For a play-by-play (or should I say "tweet-by-tweet") of Monday's meeting, check out Lane Young's Twitter page.